(This post was first published on my personal blog http://anandkumarrs.com on 20th Mar, 2017)
Today was just another Sunday morning. As I turned on the ignition of my car for a Sunday morning drive, Ilayaraja’s (Raja) hits started playing. On top of the playlist was Raja Kaiya Vecha,…,… from the hit film Apoorva Sagotharargal. There are 2 versions of this song – one sung by Kamal Haasan himself which eventually featured in the film and the other sung by S.P. Balasubramanyam (SPB) which just got retained in the music album. Its’ very rare that a song sung by SPB and composed by Raja gets consigned to just the album. As I was enjoying the interlude in that song which has some awesome feet tapping music, the CD started playing truant and was jumping few tracks and eventually it stopped. My Sunday morning tryst with Raja-SPB duo got aborted midway. At that point in time, I had no premonition of what was to follow later.
Reaching home, soon I could see SPB’s Facebook post going viral where he claimed that he has been served legal notice by Raja’s attorney for singing Raja’s compositions without prior permission in his recent World tour stage shows. And that in the rest of the shows, he may not be singing Raja’s songs. Difficult to believe, the first reaction was of course “Why would Raja take such an extreme step against SPB who was a close friend, associate and a fellow traveller in his music journey?” In a spat involving these 2 namely Raja and SPB for people like me who have grown up with the music of the 70’s and 80’s it is difficult to take a stand. On the one hand you have Raja, a genius and whose music transcends all superlatives. And on the other hand you have a singer who even today can give an Arijit Singh a run for his money with his mellifluous voice and versatile singing. While a lean and fit Raja is known to have a bloated ego, the physically fuller SPB comes across as a man of humility and feather lite ego. Even in this FB post he didn’t have one word of disrespect for Raja and admitted his own ignorance of legalities. He won the hearts and the sympathies of the fandom.
To be fair, it was important to hear out Raja’s side before getting judgemental on his action. And soon in the course of the day we did get to see the same through Raja’s legal consultant who was probably behind shooting this legal notice. As expected he talked of violation of IP rights, royalty payments,…,… The issue of copyrights and Intellectual property rights (IP) on music compositions have of late become a bone of contention between music composers, Lyricists and film producers. The fact of the matter is till about the first decade of this millennium, lyricist and music composers were blissfully unaware of their Intellectual copy rights with a result they were never paid royalty by producers for their creations. Only recently, with the exposure to Hollywood,.. the composers and lyricists became aware of their IP rights. A.R. Rahman now owns the IP for all the music he creates.
Looking up on the issue of Indian Copyright Act, I understood that in 2012 the amendments made to the act set right the historical anomaly of being not beneficial to the creators. Famed Hindi lyricist Javed Akhtar was instrumental in getting the amendments passed. Historically, Indian film producers just paid a one-time fee to song writers, composers and singers. And denied them revenues from other sources like cover versions, ringtones, digital downloads,.. which have become increasingly lucrative.
The amended bill now makes song writers and composers as owners of the copyright which cannot be assigned to the producers as per earlier version. More importantly, as a recurring source of revenue, it is now mandatory for broadcasters – Radio, TV and Digital to pay a royalty to the copyright owners each time the song is played.
It seems that it is now part of the standard operating procedure for singers to take formal permission from the music composers before performing their songs on stage. And as part of this process, the acceptance to pay the applicable royalty. So it comes as a surprise that event producers of SPB’s recent concerts missed this point of not informing or taking Raja’s permission for singing his songs. So from a purely legal standpoint, it is clear that Raja has not hit a wrong note on this matter. But then SPB is not just another singer. He has been a constant companion to Raja all through, with the duo churning out some thousands of hits. It is today hypothetical to argue if the duo’s songs were hits because of Raja’s music or SPB’s singing. For a fan the Raja-SPB combination was magical and together they have given some evergreen, everlasting music which will continue to live forever in his/her heart.
From Raja’s side could it have been handled differently? Certainly one would feel so. Instead of a legal notice, a friendly call to remind the SPB camp of the IP issue would probably have settled the issue under wraps. Unless otherwise we are not privy to some larger conflict of interests between the two themselves or their minders. In which case after Vairamuthu and Bharathiraja SPB could be the latest to land on the other side of Raja’s symphony.
‘Intha Raja Kaiya Vecha,…. Wronga ponathilla,.. ‘goes the song. The genius lyricist Vaali wrote this line probably keeping Ilayaraja in mind on his music. But on this issue, it appears Raja has hit a wrong note! He probably should lay his hand on the phone to call SPB and undo this wrong bit, unless Raja chose to use syncopation!!!
Being an ardent of fan of both Raja and SPB, to me what has happened is sad and disappointing. In terms of taking sides on this spat, the head wants to go with Raja and the heart with SPB. But then the ears are always with the duo!!! Let the Andhi Mazhai continue to pour!!!
Here is the grapevine on this:
Apparently during the 2016 US concert tour of Raaja, SPB had demanded a rather hefty sum for his performing in each concert during the tour.
His stand was he was completing 50 years in the industry and deserved that.
It turns out that the organizers were in a fix because paying that huge amount to just SPB alone would inflate the tour expenses to an extent that they would not break even, from the concerts in the form of tickets.
The largest percentage of ppl attending those concerts go for the lowest price first which was $35-45. Thus in the event of paying SPB what he had asked for, would have forced the organizers to jack up ticket prices to break even. And that could have likely prevented many from attending the concerts. Raaja is a popular yes, one of the accomplished composers in the world yes. But let’s face it these are not Bon Jovi, Deep Purple concerts. So jacking up prices was/is Economically unsustainable.
Raaja didn’t take this well – one would suspect he must have felt kind of ‘betrayed’ by someone whom he considered very close professionally and maybe personally as well.
And so, Raaja went on the tour using Mano and Karthik (on stage instead of SPB) mainly for most of the songs originally rendered by SPB and it was a successful tour despite the absence of SPB.
Then comes SPBs concert tour of the US and Raajas legal notice when the tour was already on.
Perhaps this explains why Raaja did not personally ask/inform him about the IP issue.
One would think as a fan that this was an unwanted ‘tit for tat’.
But in the professional world of music, it’s not just egos at work but also matters of trust, etc.
Raajas perception of ‘betrayal’ plus SPBs sense of entitlement (howsoever justified it might be) likely lead to this situation.
Had SPB asked for the sum on a different tour by himself the overall costs might have been affordable. But to pay for an entire orchestra as well as Raaja and SPB would have become a burden as explained above.
LikeLike
Thanks for the input, Kiran
LikeLike